|









| |
Professor Ray Griffith of the University of Wisconsin reviews
"Open My Eyes" on his November 2nd, 1987 Commmentary on Wisconsin Public Radio.
| "What a wonderful artistic experience
“The Story of Andro” is! You have a truly remarkable, compelling voice (and
your phrasing contains a hint of Warren Zevon, a pinch of Leonard Cohen). I
particularly like how well the music counterpoints your voice and theme. My
wife Linda was also impressed. If the cantata has a flaw, it’s perhaps that
it requires much of the listener. In this respect, I’m wondering if the CD
is a finished product or work in progress. If it’s in progress, maybe you
could consider adding a chorus or at least a refrain to many of the cuts.
That way, the listener has something to hang on/come back to. The way you
begin “But of course” seems to reach for that kind of thing."
—Joseph Lisowski, Ph.D.
06/05/2006 |
"...a quiet music in the language, attention to subtle
texture, a sense of physical presence, and a deep kinesthetic awareness in
these poems which root them firmly in the here and now."
—Sarah Beers, The Writers' Place, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp.
9-11.
|
"Whatever his subject,
in every poem there is at least one mysterious evocation that jars the
reader into a sense of the marvelous."
—Jay
Bail, The Book Reader, July-August 1990
|
"With a layered collage of words and sounds, the art of
'Fuzzy Logic' is at once mystical and edged. Meanings, sharply
clarified, float and then blend on shimmering ponds of music. A
wonderful eclectic...electric...experience!"
—Annie Randall, Village Booksmith (November 8, 2003)
|
Canto 1 is tremendously rich in
association, filled with movement and energy. It’s a virtual orgy of sound and
image, while still remaining grounded in the scene. Actually, I’m envious of
what you were able to do here. Where Canto 1 talked to Dante, Canto
4 talks to Pound with maybe a sidebar to Charles Olson. And it gives a touch
of Herbert and again, an echo of Dylan. Wonderful stuff.
—Joseph Lisowski
|
Cynthia Cotts' review of Open My Eyes
in The Village Voice:

I'm someone who holds cosmic ideas about as long as a
substance high: after the rush anxiety falls like a net. The enlightenment
I once got from Be Here Now, and white lightning dispersed when
global entropy set in for good.
I say that to preface my admiration for an independently
produced—and very cosmic—cassette. On Open My Eyes, Ron Ellis
recites his poetry to an acoustic/electronic soundtrack; and the dualities
abound. While Ellis's lyrics launch a vision romantic and spacey as
Blake's, his meticulous formal compositions land the tape clean in the
'80s. Ellis cites influences diverse as Buddhist chants on the one hand,
and his former teacher Alvin Lucier on the other.
First off, "Macadamia Nut" is the perfect
answer to a conceptual assignment. Several voices find themselves stuck
inside the eponymous nut. To get out, they must fashion an incantation
with words made up only of letters contained in the words "macadamia
nut." After a Babylon of brainstorming, they unfurl a musical
solution and crack the nut.
Another choice cut is "Wind Gauge," a takeoff
on the card you used to be able to get from the Jefferson County agent,
which tells you how to recognize different speeds of wind. As Ellis's
mini-poems evoke the wind at increasing intensity, the Chamber Rock
Ensemble pursues the atmosphere onomatomusically. Thus we go from calm (thoughts
like steeping tea) and 1-to-12 mph (imagine erotic breath)
to 73- to-120 (shall we ponder in the cellar? or stay here until the
roof lifts off?). At a windspeed of 800-to-1,160,000, entropy moves
in (earth out of orbit, be alert for further bulletins...can I get you
something for those hemhorraging eyes?) This cut begs for nonprofit
airplay.
Competently rendered, the soundtrack on Open My Eyes
sometimes recalls Zappa, sometimes Glass. The fusion end of the spectrum
can be gratingly derivative, but on a cut like "Golgonooza,"
sax, guitars, synth, and percussion provide the apt correlative mesh for a
lyric that's phonetically and metaphysically complex. Affecting a
self-ironic baritone, Ellis twists hip buzz-words into an iridescent
helix—and lets it hang. Golgonoo-za, don't wanna looooose-ya, goes the
hypnotic mantra until it escapes meaning, exactly the way it's supposed
to.
The surprise here is not that an academic who publishes
in university reviews has conceptually rendered the ecstasy of electronics
and Tao, but that such a seemingly retro vision can still liberate
consciousness—if briefly—from its scheming to find the next rush.
—Cynthia Cotts |
Articulating
Artistry:
The
Madison Music Collective Presents Jazz Meets Poetry
By
John Noyd, Night Sights and Sounds
I
must admit that I was somewhat baffled when the first four pieces offered
at the Jazz Meets Poetry presentation at the First Unitarian Meeting House
[Madison, Wisconsin] on March 26 [1996], were wordless, unaccompanied jazz
piano numbers by Paul Hastil. His departing remarks were, "That is
all I have to play and that is all I have to say." In hindsight, it
occurred to me that perhaps the piano was the speaker of motifs and
phrases, that jazz and poetry need not have a human voice. Perhaps the
next performance would reveal evidence of this theory.
The
cyber-punk musical renegades Dangerous Odds were next in line. Again, they
started out speechless. But like Paul, exhibited daring jazz talent.
Working from a highly technical level, perhaps it was now the midi-induced
electronics that were speaking. Their second number lent support to this
idea. Enunciating UW-Whitewater professor/performance poet Ron Ellis
joined the Odds for a scenario of computer chatter entitled "Parallel
Interface." The music warped and wove with wings of starry nights,
responding to the linguistic twists with glittering hyperdrive. But this
was just priming the pump for the next verbal assault.
Larry
Giles modestly stepped upon the stage to relay his thoughts on John Cage,
entitling his piece, 'What the Piano Player Did to Me." Larry had the
hep beat knee jerk jive spurting gone pitter patter of the layered jingo
down pat, and his play of words seemed to whip up a maelstrom of
fragmented infinities from the Odds. Of special note were the processed
vibrations of woodwind player Al Jewer. His carpetbag of goodies included
a bass flute with a sound that seemed to come from some crater on the
moon. When Ron came back for a reading of "Canto
71," the double-barreled blast of twin basses from Al and
multi-instrumentalist Arthur Durkee scratched and scrounged around some
celestial cellar to produce a thick bed for the curlicue queries of Ron's
scrambled stream of conscious rhetoric. Larry returned with a fiery work
entitled "April Conversation," and Ron ended the set with a tune
hoisted by Middle Eastern twists of catapulting rhythms courtesy of
drummer Tom Hamer.
After
a short intermission, pianist Dave Stoler performed. His two song set
included an improvisation to a written text by Dave read by Dangerous Odds
violinist Biff Uranus. Titled "Urban Legends," it rejoiced in a
time when jazz and poetry were more kissin' cousins than they are today.
The reading recalled the beat attitude which merged a flurry of intuitive
creativity jazz was known to celebrate.
This
casual improvisation was carried through with the last act of the evening.
Kelly DeHaven and bassist Jeff Eckels scatted and scuttled like a cubist's
daydream with the popular tune "Bye Bye Blackbird," then, as
they were performing in a secular setting, a gymnastic work-out of
"Amazing Grace." But the highlight of their set came when they
invited pianist Paul Hastil up on stage to tear through a version of
"Charlie Parker's Blues." With a reading of Jack Kerouac
attached to the end, it came closest to the late fifties coffeehouse feel
with which jazz and poetry are best associated. A narrative diary run
through debut by Alvin Hishinuma ended the set and the presentation for
the evening. No one put on berets and clicked their approval, but all were
visibly encouraged that the creative freedom that jazz and poetry call for
has not been forgotten.
|
Critics' Choice, Isthmus Guide to Arts and Entertainment, Madison,
August 7, 1998
AL JEWER & RON ELLIS: Here's a perfect coffeehouse gig, recalling
the days of beatniks and bongos (sic). Jewer and Ellis are members of
Dangerous Odds, which combines musical improvisation with poetic flights
of fancy; they'll offer more of the same in this duo format, with Jewer
weaving saxophonic filigree around Ellis' hip phonemes. Fri., Aug. 7,
1998, Mother Fool's Coffeehouse, 8 pm.
|
The Best of Dangerous Odds, Vol. 2
Label: Laughing Cat Records
Release Date: 1997
Dangerous Odds are Al Jewer (flute, woodwind synthesizer, sax,
bass), Art Durkee (Chapman stick), Tom Hamer (drums), Diedre Buckley
(viola), Ron Ellis (poet), Larry Giles (poetry, voice). Guests
include Biff Blumfumgagnge, Ross Nielsen. Heather Figi, Kristina Hord,
Blain Kennedy, Rick Murphy are featured as special guests.
The Best of Dangerous Odds, Vol. 2 is the Madison, Wisconsin group’s
debut, titled because of material taken from performances in the
band's second four years 1993-96 (See? So the title does too make
sense).
Dangerous Odds formed in 1990 as a reformation of Chamber Rock
Ensemble, a prior poetry music project featuring Al Jewer. Ron Ellis
dubbed the band "Good Odds" at first, then Durkee wanted
"Danger" in there somewhere to reflect the band's
commitment to performing without the" 'safety net'
of rehearsal". Since then, the band has been playing in “all
styles of music from classical to jazz to experimental to
groove-based rock, and many more—frequently at the same time.”
Devotion to improvisation aside, another factor marking this group as
unusual is the “Guitar Free Zone” declaration. Almost all the
tracks but a couple on Vol. 2 are without guitars, creating an
interesting musical climate.
If experimental spontaneous music and spoken word performance created
in a Guitar Free Zone tickles your eardrums, I dare you to try Dangerous
Odds.
The Best of Dangerous Odds, Vol. 2 is available via mail-order for
us $15 + $1.00 S/H at the Laughing Cat label's web site, http://www.lafcat.com/.
Track listing:
Dangerous Odds: This track starts with a slow steady bass riff in a
regular rhythm while mid tone flute flutters about and harmonies in
spurts through out the song. Ron Ellis' sing song recital of stream
of consciousness verses takes forefront amidst various instruments
being played. Ellis’ voice doesn't rank with James Earl Jones but
it's not glaring or boring.
Clocks in Chaos starts with the constant ticking of a clock in
time. In the distant background Larry Giles atonally recites lyrics
about time, chaos and famous scientific theorists like Einstein and
Heisenberg.
AgGaGahGiGihGao. The wackiest track features vocal cacophony in the
style of McFerrin overlapping and interplaying while a flute wavers
and warbles alongside bass notes. Gentle percussion as the song ends
with sax and the coos of an infant (Jewer's baby son) makes you
wonder of the song title wasn't inspired by baby talk. Funny and
wildly silly, this stand out song could be a real laugh riot
performed for a live audience.
Remote Manipulator: Rather than monologue poetry recital this song
features dialogue between a human and a machine monolith—the Hal
2000-like Remote Manipulator.
I Want My Ph.D: A chorus languidly sings a capella style “I want my
Ph.D.” To the tune of Dire Straits’ "Money For
Nothing". Is this an ode to the virtues of education? You
decide.
Ricochet: Ron Ellis chants verses amidst eclectic instruments being
played in harmonic cacophony.
To Steve Reich: Larry Giles' dedication to Reich laps over an
orchestra of instruments and sounds like melodic string synth.
Bone Flute: Bone flute intro recalls to mind R. Carlos Nakai playing
in the Native American musical tradition. The lyrics spoken here have
a spiritual, mystical feel to them ("Please make a flute of my
bone"). The use of the viola guitar is notable here.
Nhema Mutato: African musical traditions get the Dangerous Odds
treatment as Durkee plays a Zimbabwean sub-contrabass mbira, commonly
known as a thumb piano. One hears the intermittent sounds of car
shocks. The song has an Art of Noise vibe going on.
Cellular: The single guitar like note seems to sing throughout the
song while Ron Ellis sparingly recites poetry.
L'hôtel: A jazzy slow bass riff introduces Larry Giles delivery
of unenergetic poetry with a faux French accent. As much as I liked
that bass line, this was a weak song.
I Love a Parade: A booming kettle drum intro wakes the ears, heralding
Biff Blumfumgagnge’s high pitched voice reciting the keys on a
keyboard, Q-W-E-R-T-Y. Whatta happy racket is this wacked out parody
of circus music!
Tantrum: This instrumental includes synth sounds that sound like
Edward Van Halen going wild with his guitar, accompanying unbridled
Stick sounds.
Darkness: A dirge like piece with a Gothic feel evokes the peace of
the crypt. Not. This song is eerie, dammit. It's almost as if the
players are mourning the end of the CD.
—Vivian E. Lee
|
Professor Ray Griffith of the University of Wisconsin
reviews "Open My Eyes" on his November 2nd, 1987 Commmentary on Wisconsin
Public Radio.
Ray Griffith
Wisconsin Public
Radio
Open My Eyes
(Ron Ellis
performing part of poem "Hubbub" from album "Open My Eyes.)
Supposing there
were an ampule of impudent song
that when
shattered transforms
esters of
yesterday?
I see now the
tatters of spin-dried Oriental tapestry
must hang out
with the laundry of Western folderol.
Who could make a
whole patch
of such a set of
blankets?
(Music continues at low level behind first lines of
commentary, then fades out.)
That’s Wisconsin poet Ron Ellis doing his poem "Hubbub"
from his album entitled "Open My Eyes." All eleven poems in the album are
performed with music, or at least sound accompaniment, supplied by a group
called the Chamber Rock Ensemble. Nowadays there’s increasing interest in
poets "performing" their works in public appearance rather than only reading
their poems. Universities that invite poets to campus often specify they
want performances, not readings that recreate the printed page orally. And
the same is true with other places that offer poetry. Two of the poems Ron
Ellis does in his album "Open My Eyes" were recorded live before audiences
at the Cafe Carpe in Fort Atkinson, which presents poetry as regular
entertainment. Performance can range from reading poems with dramatic
emphasis to presenting poetry along with other media—with music, with visual
art, with dance interpretation, with what have you. The accompaniment to the
Ron Ellis poems in the album varies from the classical flute played by Al
Jewer and jam sessions of the Rock Chamber Ensemble to sound utilizing
complicated technology—multiple tracks, synthesizers, and harmonizers. And
the music has echoes of everything from Tibetan chants to the Fifth
Brandenburg Concerto to the Rolling Stones to working computers. The
eclectic sounds are appropriate to the eclectic poetry. seemingly Ron Ellis
tries to incorporate in his poems many of the/opposite poles that are part
of civilization in the 1980’s. There’s the interaction, for instance,
between Weastern and Eastern thought, as in these lines from "Hubbub":
I see now the
tatters of spin-dried Oriental tapestry
must hang out
with the laundry of Western folderol.
Who could make a
whole patch
of such a set of
blankets?
The sounds produced by the synthesizers and computers are
appropriate to the album "Open My Byes" because there’s a lot about
technology in the poems. Many poets—and non-poets too—think in terms of the
conflict between the humanistic and the technological, a polarization with
technology on one side and nature on the other—natural human beings and a
woodsy kind of nature with trees and flowers and loons and raccoons. But Ron
Ellis sees technology and nature intermingling, for technology is really
part of the nature of the world we live in, and part of our nature also.
After all, it is a human pursuit.
His poems do contain lyrical passages about the outdoor
woodsy nature. In one he says:
This morning
grackles held a vast conventicle
concatenating out of the trees like blowing
dandelion seeds. Blue- and sun- sky swells
in the tomato
whose blood-juice sings
in my stomach
while a cicada like a tuning-fork
thrums the
sympathetic note...
And he writes
about technological phenomena:
Efficient robots
wearing metal fatigues
are under orders
to KEEP THIS SPACE CLEAR.
It may be
emptiness but it’s all we have.
It may be just a
surface but it’s clean.
But almost all the poems combine nature in the special
sense and technology, as in my favorite of the poems, "Night Out." On a
summer night he stands at the screen door which has become "an immense grid"
and watches a moth pace "from square to square" and sees "its thorax throb /
against the rule of the possible." Outside he watches the insects attracted
by the porch light: "... moths spiral to the filament, / splashing dusty
scales / against the light-bulb/sun."
His details about the moths—
ecstatic cabbage
looper:
furious nyph
underwing:
hickory tiger
prossessed:
are matched by the details of the light bulb— "thin membrane
of glass," "radiant electron stream" "white-hot streaming core" and the
clear letters of the alphabet that spell out "Gerneral Electric." He stands
on the porch with a moth—a "white-winged dagger"—caught in his hair and he
he is is part of nature but/just as attracted to the incadesent bulb as the
moths. To Ron Ellis the conflict is not outside human beings but within. The
important thing is, he says in "Canto Five,"
...the sacred
text of the finite mind.
Untranslatable,
yet bound in the texture of the slightest ordinary life.
And later:
The most sacred text of the finite mind is you, staring
you in the face.
The polarity is within all the possible you’s, and you
facing you. In another poem, "The Arousal," Ron Ellis says:
Too long
the Imaginative
Beast
lay tethered and
sedate
submissive to the
designing hand
and file of the
rational faculty.
So maybe that’s it. The conflict isn’t between nature and
technology, or between Eastern and Western philosophy, the conflict is
within the human mind either dealing with the world creatively or
noncreatively.
Ron Ellis is on the side of creativity. But what is
creativity? It’s empathy with other people and other forms of life. It’s an
awareness of what you’re doing and an effort to determine why you’re doing
it. It’s humility. This album of poems by Ron Ellis is called "Open My
Eyes," not "Open Your Eyes." It’s an exploration, not a lecture. And a sense
of humor helps to keep things in perspective, even in such a major issue in
the poem "Hubbub" as to whether you’re a "hub type" or a "bub type."
(Music of "Hubbub" and final lines performed by Ron Ellis on
tape album "Open My Eyes.")
It’s all in the
left and right hubbubspheres.
You have your hub
types and your bub types.
Listening to both
at once you have your
urbane
stereotypes.
With hub you have
hubba-hubba hobbies, fuzzy thinking hobbits.
With bub you have
bubliophiles and bubbachambers
coming out of
accelerator shootouts
of the Ten Most
Wanted Particles.
I’m more hubba
than bubba,
for bubba or
verse.
How’s about you?
Doin’ the one
with the two.
Doin’ the one with the two.
|
Student
Review (!) of a Dangerous Odds Performance
at
UW-Whitewater
I
had the opportunity to view the dramatic poetry readings of Dangerous Odds
on the twelfth of November, 1996. The audience was mainly composed of
English 102 students that congregated in the McGraw Auditorium. As I
walked into the auditorium I was not prepared for what I was going to
encounter. There was loud instruments that didn't make any attempt to
harmonize in any way. It kind of reminded me of my days in Woodstock. As
my first poetry reading performance, I did not walk away with a good
impression. The band in the background provided psychotic music that did
not contribute to the mood of the poetry, the visual films on the big
screen did not have anything to do with the poem content, and the poems
themselves had negative themes and left one in a helpless mood.
The
background setting was comprised of a small band with diverse instruments
and an overhead screen projecting various short film segments that had no
correlation to each other or towards the poetry that was read while it was
being played. There was no point and time where I really knew if the band
members knew how to play their instruments or not. Through the duration of
the first two poems, ("Now Listen" and "Dangerous
Odds") I came to realize that there was no pattern to the ambiguous
banging and strumming of notes that polluted the air. At first, I thought
that the "music" set the eiree mood that was present behind the
first couple poems, but then it became very apparent that the perpetuating
noise coming from the instruments was a standard choice for all of the
poem's backgrounds.
The
visuals on the big screen were comprised of film shorts ranging from
psychedelic colors to National Geographic centerfolds to the crew of
Apollo 13. The audience was left to try to discover a connection between
the randomly selected film excerpts and the meanings of the poems that
they were being read with. An example of this would be in the poem reading
of "There's a Hush". This poem was obviously a satirical
admonition against the dangers of destroying the world's precious
resources. Oddly enough, the film that was supposed to correspond to the
poem included a moving locomotive. I don't understand what the common
denominator was between the two ideas.
The
poetry itself consisted of a wide range of topics from Kurt Cobain's
suicide to environmental issues to a drug-dealing kid facing his father.
Overall, the poetry left one with a lack of hope dealing with negative
overtune. For example, "The Dead End Kid" can be summed up with
the concept of a loser kid who sells drugs and his father is confronting
him about his future in life. Unfotunately, this poem (like all the
others) reveal a common problem in the world and never provide a solution
for it. Another point that I found extremely annoying was how the poems
contained incorrect grammer rules. In "There's A Hush" the
sentence "yeah I had his ass killed ain't that a shame" when
authors write in the vernacular it's hard to understand what points he or
she is trying to get across in his writings.
I
don't think the audience was expecting what they were experiencing. In
fact, I think everyone was in a state of utter shock. As I looked at my
other peers, I noticed the same dazed and confused look plastered across
my fellow classmates' faces. After talking to some of my peers, we tried
to establish a better understanding of the performance's theme but
collectively came up to the conclusion that it was very confusing to
determine what the significance of the poetry that we were supposed to
pick up on.
Dangerous
Odds wasn't what I had expected at all. The music really didn't accomadate
the mood of the poems and the films held no meaning for me. The poetry
itself dealt with negative topics that presented me with real-life
problems and left me with a sense of hopelessness when no potential
solution was offered. I think the experience gave me a different view of
how poetry is performed. |
|