A nything richer than a book in a tent?Sometimes too bright the eye of glaring middle-order dims the edges feathering into potential. Thanks to Gleick: Simple systems give rise to complex behavior. Complex systems give rise to simple behavior. We knock about in well-lit crocks clanging spotless orisons. We polish the mirrors of hard surfaces to reflect retinues of retinal configurations. We bathe in porcelain basins of attraction and justify brand-names. The satisfactions of all these certainties didn’t satisfy Edward Lorenz who put the whether in weather who cried sensitive dependence on initial conditions who gave us fractals of inquietude, not to mention THE END OF THE REDUCTIONIST PROGRAM. Peitgen: The tree, let’s say—what is important? Is it the straight line, or is it the fractal object? Does the earth’s climate follow a strange attractor? Holmes: The complicated, aperiodic, attracting orbits of certain (usually low-dimensional) dynamical systems. Trace out the labyrinth within the quotidian. Bai-Lin: A kind of order without periodicity...a newly recognized and ubiquitous class of natural phenomena. Inch with sticky fingers across the passing lane. Stewart: Apparently random recurrent behavior in a simple deterministic (clockwork-like) system. We must seek out the feathered edges of strange repellers. Ford: Dynamics freed at last from the shackles of order and predictability. . . . Systems Iiberated to randomly explore their every dynamical possibility. . . exciting variety, richness of choice, a cornucopia of opportunity. Canoe down random rapids to the isthmus of the oceanic!
|
|
|